<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (12) TMI 159 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73490</link>
    <description>Central excise valuation relief based on invoice price is unavailable where a manufacturer and distributor have mutual commercial and financial interests that influence pricing. Cross-shareholding, common facilities and staff, predominant purchasing, and preferential pricing indicate that the parties are related persons. Assessable value must then be derived from the distributor&#039;s sale price after only legally permissible deductions: specified post-removal expenses, excise duty and sales tax may be deductible, while testing and warranty costs remain includible as normal manufacturer obligations. Suppression of material relationship and exemption-related facts can support extended limitation; penalties may nevertheless be reduced where demands overlap or valuation deductions require recomputation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:16:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (12) TMI 159 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73490</link>
      <description>Central excise valuation relief based on invoice price is unavailable where a manufacturer and distributor have mutual commercial and financial interests that influence pricing. Cross-shareholding, common facilities and staff, predominant purchasing, and preferential pricing indicate that the parties are related persons. Assessable value must then be derived from the distributor&#039;s sale price after only legally permissible deductions: specified post-removal expenses, excise duty and sales tax may be deductible, while testing and warranty costs remain includible as normal manufacturer obligations. Suppression of material relationship and exemption-related facts can support extended limitation; penalties may nevertheless be reduced where demands overlap or valuation deductions require recomputation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>