<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (12) TMI 146 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73477</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi ruled that &quot;non-woven surgical dressings bandages&quot; fell under the entry at S. No. 31 of Appendix 2, Part B, requiring a license for import, despite the appellant&#039;s argument that they were covered by a different entry. The Tribunal held that the term &quot;fabric&quot; in the relevant entry encompassed non-woven materials based on provided literature and the nature of the imported material. The Tribunal found judgments cited by the appellant irrelevant and confirmed the requirement for a license. However, the penalty imposed on the appellant was set aside due to a genuine belief in the Open General License, resulting in the appeal being disposed of with this modification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:44:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (12) TMI 146 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73477</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi ruled that &quot;non-woven surgical dressings bandages&quot; fell under the entry at S. No. 31 of Appendix 2, Part B, requiring a license for import, despite the appellant&#039;s argument that they were covered by a different entry. The Tribunal held that the term &quot;fabric&quot; in the relevant entry encompassed non-woven materials based on provided literature and the nature of the imported material. The Tribunal found judgments cited by the appellant irrelevant and confirmed the requirement for a license. However, the penalty imposed on the appellant was set aside due to a genuine belief in the Open General License, resulting in the appeal being disposed of with this modification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>