<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 218 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73475</link>
    <description>The judgment set aside the orders of the Assistant Collector and the Collector (Appeals), remanding the matter for fresh consideration. The competent authority was directed to consider the genuineness of the appellants&#039; request for an extension, the effect of the re-export, and whether any amount could still be demanded. The fresh adjudication was ordered to be completed within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:41:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 218 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73475</link>
      <description>The judgment set aside the orders of the Assistant Collector and the Collector (Appeals), remanding the matter for fresh consideration. The competent authority was directed to consider the genuineness of the appellants&#039; request for an extension, the effect of the re-export, and whether any amount could still be demanded. The fresh adjudication was ordered to be completed within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>