https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73460 The Tribunal upheld the Board's order, dismissing the appeals due to non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements. The appellants' contentions regarding financial capacity consideration, double punishment, penalty exceeding seized goods' value, and lack of evidence against one appellant were rejected. The Tribunal found the Board's decision reasonable and not harsh, emphasizing the correctness of the order and lack of procedural or legal flaws. en-us Wed, 26 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:59:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73460 The Tribunal upheld the Board's order, dismissing the appeals due to non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements. The appellants' contentions regarding financial capacity consideration, double punishment, penalty exceeding seized goods' value, and lack of evidence against one appellant were rejected. The Tribunal found the Board's decision reasonable and not harsh, emphasizing the correctness of the order and lack of procedural or legal flaws. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 26 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73460