<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 208 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73452</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals, setting aside the Collector&#039;s order of confiscation of diamonds and penalties. The judgment emphasized that the seizure by the Customs Officers was not lawful under Section 110 of the Customs Act, Section 123 did not apply, and the appellants had satisfactorily discharged any burden of proof regarding the legality of the diamonds. Consequently, the penalties imposed under Section 112(b) were also unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 208 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73452</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals, setting aside the Collector&#039;s order of confiscation of diamonds and penalties. The judgment emphasized that the seizure by the Customs Officers was not lawful under Section 110 of the Customs Act, Section 123 did not apply, and the appellants had satisfactorily discharged any burden of proof regarding the legality of the diamonds. Consequently, the penalties imposed under Section 112(b) were also unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>