https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73449 An appeal filed beyond the statutory limitation period was rejected where no condonation application was made and the explanation that the order was not received was not accepted on postal acknowledgment evidence. Interference with refusal to condone delay was held permissible only if the discretion had been exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, or unjustly; no such defect was shown, so the time-bar dismissal was justified and no interference was warranted. en-us Thu, 12 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:58:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73449 An appeal filed beyond the statutory limitation period was rejected where no condonation application was made and the explanation that the order was not received was not accepted on postal acknowledgment evidence. Interference with refusal to condone delay was held permissible only if the discretion had been exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, or unjustly; no such defect was shown, so the time-bar dismissal was justified and no interference was warranted. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73449