<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 284 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the classification of imported goods as &quot;woollen waste&quot; or processed woollen products. It held that the goods were indeed woollen waste, making them eligible for duty exemption under Customs Notification No. 240-Cus., dated 2-8-1976. The Tribunal found that the rejection of ITC licenses for import of wool waste was incorrect as the goods were classified as woollen waste. Additionally, it criticized the Additional Collector for not adhering to principles of natural justice in the adjudication proceedings. The impugned orders were set aside, and refunds were ordered for fines and duties paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:54:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 284 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the classification of imported goods as &quot;woollen waste&quot; or processed woollen products. It held that the goods were indeed woollen waste, making them eligible for duty exemption under Customs Notification No. 240-Cus., dated 2-8-1976. The Tribunal found that the rejection of ITC licenses for import of wool waste was incorrect as the goods were classified as woollen waste. Additionally, it criticized the Additional Collector for not adhering to principles of natural justice in the adjudication proceedings. The impugned orders were set aside, and refunds were ordered for fines and duties paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>