<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (12) TMI 113 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73434</link>
    <description>Approved classification lists governed duty liability until modified under the prescribed procedure, so where Handloom cess was omitted from an approved list, the proper course was to amend the list or invoke the recovery mechanism for non-levied duty. A demand raised merely by directing payment through RT-12 returns, without issuing a show-cause notice and completing regular adjudication, did not follow the required procedure and was therefore unsustainable. The lower authorities&#039; demands were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 18:19:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (12) TMI 113 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73434</link>
      <description>Approved classification lists governed duty liability until modified under the prescribed procedure, so where Handloom cess was omitted from an approved list, the proper course was to amend the list or invoke the recovery mechanism for non-levied duty. A demand raised merely by directing payment through RT-12 returns, without issuing a show-cause notice and completing regular adjudication, did not follow the required procedure and was therefore unsustainable. The lower authorities&#039; demands were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>