<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 203 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73433</link>
    <description>Additional excise duty exemption on samples applied only from 19 June 1976, when the notification expressly covered that separate levy; the earlier exemption for basic excise duty did not extend to additional duty, so pre-notification demands remained sustainable. Price-list approvals disallowing the discount on B-grade fabrics and cash discount were made without notice or hearing. Consequential demands founded on approvals made in breach of natural justice required fresh adjudication after hearing the assessee; the discount-related demands were therefore set aside for reconsideration. A later exemption notification cannot operate retrospectively unless its terms expressly provide otherwise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 18:12:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 203 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73433</link>
      <description>Additional excise duty exemption on samples applied only from 19 June 1976, when the notification expressly covered that separate levy; the earlier exemption for basic excise duty did not extend to additional duty, so pre-notification demands remained sustainable. Price-list approvals disallowing the discount on B-grade fabrics and cash discount were made without notice or hearing. Consequential demands founded on approvals made in breach of natural justice required fresh adjudication after hearing the assessee; the discount-related demands were therefore set aside for reconsideration. A later exemption notification cannot operate retrospectively unless its terms expressly provide otherwise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>