<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 182 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73413</link>
    <description>For central excise, an intermediate product is dutiable only if it emerges as a marketable commodity known to the market and covered by the relevant tariff entry. Starch hydrolysate produced and captively used in sorbitol manufacture was found unstable, prone to fermentation, and materially different from commercial liquid glucose and glucose syrup in composition and stability. Because the Department did not prove that it was bought or sold in the market, it was neither marketable goods nor glucose or liquid glucose within the tariff description. No excise duty was leviable on the product, and the duty and penalty could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 17:21:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 182 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73413</link>
      <description>For central excise, an intermediate product is dutiable only if it emerges as a marketable commodity known to the market and covered by the relevant tariff entry. Starch hydrolysate produced and captively used in sorbitol manufacture was found unstable, prone to fermentation, and materially different from commercial liquid glucose and glucose syrup in composition and stability. Because the Department did not prove that it was bought or sold in the market, it was neither marketable goods nor glucose or liquid glucose within the tariff description. No excise duty was leviable on the product, and the duty and penalty could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>