<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 202 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73409</link>
    <description>Waste or scrap arising during manufacture is not treated as manufacture of a new and distinct article unless it acquires a separate name, character or use, or the tariff expressly brings it to duty. Applying that principle, molten and broken glass cleared as &#039;Bhagar&#039; was held not to be excisable goods under Item 23A(4) of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule. The earlier view treating broken glass as manufactured goods was not followed in light of the Delhi High Court&#039;s reasoning. The challenge to the Collector (Appeals) order therefore failed, and the finding that no excise duty was payable on the glass waste was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 17:12:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 202 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73409</link>
      <description>Waste or scrap arising during manufacture is not treated as manufacture of a new and distinct article unless it acquires a separate name, character or use, or the tariff expressly brings it to duty. Applying that principle, molten and broken glass cleared as &#039;Bhagar&#039; was held not to be excisable goods under Item 23A(4) of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule. The earlier view treating broken glass as manufactured goods was not followed in light of the Delhi High Court&#039;s reasoning. The challenge to the Collector (Appeals) order therefore failed, and the finding that no excise duty was payable on the glass waste was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>