<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 203 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73395</link>
    <description>Synthetically manufactured vinegar was held not to fall within &quot;all kinds of food products&quot; under Notification No. 55/75-C.E., because the expression was construed in its ordinary commercial sense and vinegar, used as a condiment or for pickling, was not treated as a food product or food preparation; the exemption claim failed. The demand covered by the 14-12-1977 show cause notice was also held time barred, as the department did not establish any basis for invoking the extended limitation period; that demand was set aside. The assessee therefore obtained partial relief, with exemption denied but the earlier demand excluded as barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 16:28:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 203 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73395</link>
      <description>Synthetically manufactured vinegar was held not to fall within &quot;all kinds of food products&quot; under Notification No. 55/75-C.E., because the expression was construed in its ordinary commercial sense and vinegar, used as a condiment or for pickling, was not treated as a food product or food preparation; the exemption claim failed. The demand covered by the 14-12-1977 show cause notice was also held time barred, as the department did not establish any basis for invoking the extended limitation period; that demand was set aside. The assessee therefore obtained partial relief, with exemption denied but the earlier demand excluded as barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>