<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (5) TMI 137 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73319</link>
    <description>A duty demand cannot be sustained where the department produces no investigation, statements, or documentary evidence showing that the cleared goods differed from the gate-pass descriptions or fell outside the relevant exemption notifications. In the absence of proof that the goods were misdescribed or unprotected by the exemptions claimed, the demand fails for lack of evidentiary support.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 11:01:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (5) TMI 137 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73319</link>
      <description>A duty demand cannot be sustained where the department produces no investigation, statements, or documentary evidence showing that the cleared goods differed from the gate-pass descriptions or fell outside the relevant exemption notifications. In the absence of proof that the goods were misdescribed or unprotected by the exemptions claimed, the demand fails for lack of evidentiary support.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>