https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73317 Functional character controlled classification of the Dynafax High Speed Camera under the Customs Tariff, and its resemblance to a cinematograph camera was treated as decisive for Heading 90.08. The shorter film length handled, the absence of an express catalogue reference to cinematographic use, and the lack of projection did not displace that functional similarity. In this technical classification context, ordinary popular meaning was not treated as controlling in the same way as with everyday expressions. The view taken at the Collector's Conference was also regarded as having no binding effect. en-us Sat, 30 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 May 2011 10:55:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73317 Functional character controlled classification of the Dynafax High Speed Camera under the Customs Tariff, and its resemblance to a cinematograph camera was treated as decisive for Heading 90.08. The shorter film length handled, the absence of an express catalogue reference to cinematographic use, and the lack of projection did not displace that functional similarity. In this technical classification context, ordinary popular meaning was not treated as controlling in the same way as with everyday expressions. The view taken at the Collector's Conference was also regarded as having no binding effect. Case-Laws Customs Sat, 30 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73317