<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 161 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay in presenting an appeal, citing that the delay was due to legal advice provided in good faith after thorough examination of relevant authorities. Despite the mistake in the legal advice, the Tribunal found it to be a sufficient ground to justify the delay. The Tribunal scheduled the appeal for a hearing on a specific date, instructing the parties to file necessary papers within a week from the judgment date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 18:32:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 161 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay in presenting an appeal, citing that the delay was due to legal advice provided in good faith after thorough examination of relevant authorities. Despite the mistake in the legal advice, the Tribunal found it to be a sufficient ground to justify the delay. The Tribunal scheduled the appeal for a hearing on a specific date, instructing the parties to file necessary papers within a week from the judgment date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>