<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 158 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73303</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal rectified a mistake in its order by addressing an issue related to the filing of documents on a specific date due to a holiday, which was not discussed initially. The Tribunal clarified that the relevant date for determining the applicable rate of duty was when the entry inwards of the vessel was granted, upholding the impugned order and dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 18:24:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 158 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73303</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal rectified a mistake in its order by addressing an issue related to the filing of documents on a specific date due to a holiday, which was not discussed initially. The Tribunal clarified that the relevant date for determining the applicable rate of duty was when the entry inwards of the vessel was granted, upholding the impugned order and dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>