<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 161 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73283</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the imported machine was correctly classified under 84.59(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, as it was deemed similar to machines designed for treating metal and wood due to its transformative nature in creating a new commodity. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the Collector (Appeals)&#039; decision to grant a refund to the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 17:31:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 161 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73283</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the imported machine was correctly classified under 84.59(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, as it was deemed similar to machines designed for treating metal and wood due to its transformative nature in creating a new commodity. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the Collector (Appeals)&#039; decision to grant a refund to the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>