<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 152 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73275</link>
    <description>Stranded steel wires were treated as falling under the specific wire tariff entry rather than the residuary item, because a stranded form does not change the essential character of wire and a specific classification prevails over a residuary one. The text also notes that the duty demand was time barred, as no suppression was found; the department had not been misled about the nature of the goods, so the extended limitation period was unavailable. The commentary therefore states that classification and limitation both favoured the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 17:10:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 152 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73275</link>
      <description>Stranded steel wires were treated as falling under the specific wire tariff entry rather than the residuary item, because a stranded form does not change the essential character of wire and a specific classification prevails over a residuary one. The text also notes that the duty demand was time barred, as no suppression was found; the department had not been misled about the nature of the goods, so the extended limitation period was unavailable. The commentary therefore states that classification and limitation both favoured the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>