<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 227 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73270</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the applications seeking condonation of an 85-day delay in filing appeals, citing extenuating circumstances like a family emergency and the seizure of documents by enforcement agencies. Emphasizing a liberal approach to condonation in cases of non-deliberate delays, the tribunal rejected the collector&#039;s arguments of inaction or lack of bona fide. Relying on a Supreme Court decision, the tribunal highlighted the absence of culpable negligence or mala fide intent, ultimately directing the admission of the appeals. The judgment underscores the importance of considering specific circumstances leading to delays in filing appeals and adopting a lenient approach when justified by uncontrollable factors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 16:57:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 227 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73270</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the applications seeking condonation of an 85-day delay in filing appeals, citing extenuating circumstances like a family emergency and the seizure of documents by enforcement agencies. Emphasizing a liberal approach to condonation in cases of non-deliberate delays, the tribunal rejected the collector&#039;s arguments of inaction or lack of bona fide. Relying on a Supreme Court decision, the tribunal highlighted the absence of culpable negligence or mala fide intent, ultimately directing the admission of the appeals. The judgment underscores the importance of considering specific circumstances leading to delays in filing appeals and adopting a lenient approach when justified by uncontrollable factors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>