<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 226 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73269</link>
    <description>Duty liability and confiscation cannot rest on suspicion alone. The department failed to prove that 100 wrist watches seized from a bank godown were non-duty-paid goods, as the factory address on the records did not by itself establish illicit removal; the confiscation was therefore set aside and release ordered. On the alleged clandestine removals, the demand was based on presumption rather than tangible evidence, with no comparative verification of wastage in similar watch-assembly units despite a plausible explanation of manufacturing wastage; the duty demand and consequential penalty were accordingly set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 16:54:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 226 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73269</link>
      <description>Duty liability and confiscation cannot rest on suspicion alone. The department failed to prove that 100 wrist watches seized from a bank godown were non-duty-paid goods, as the factory address on the records did not by itself establish illicit removal; the confiscation was therefore set aside and release ordered. On the alleged clandestine removals, the demand was based on presumption rather than tangible evidence, with no comparative verification of wastage in similar watch-assembly units despite a plausible explanation of manufacturing wastage; the duty demand and consequential penalty were accordingly set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>