<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 218 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73261</link>
    <description>An exemption notification for goods under Item 68 was construed by reference to the ordinary and commercial meaning of its undefined terms. The Tribunal held that the meaning of &quot;insecticides&quot; in the notification could not be controlled by the schedule or definition in the Insecticides Act, 1968, because a definition from another statute dealing with a different subject should not be imported unless expressly adopted. On the materials before it, products used to prevent or repel insects could fall within the notification&#039;s use of insecticides or pesticides, so exemption could not be denied merely because the products were absent from the Insecticides Act schedule.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 16:28:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 218 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73261</link>
      <description>An exemption notification for goods under Item 68 was construed by reference to the ordinary and commercial meaning of its undefined terms. The Tribunal held that the meaning of &quot;insecticides&quot; in the notification could not be controlled by the schedule or definition in the Insecticides Act, 1968, because a definition from another statute dealing with a different subject should not be imported unless expressly adopted. On the materials before it, products used to prevent or repel insects could fall within the notification&#039;s use of insecticides or pesticides, so exemption could not be denied merely because the products were absent from the Insecticides Act schedule.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>