https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73254 A show cause notice for differential central excise duty was not vitiated merely because it did not state the exact quantified demand or precise dates where the assessee alone controlled the relevant clearance data and had withheld it despite repeated requisitions. The notice was treated as sufficiently clear because it set out the basis of the demand with adequate particularity under Rule 10 of the Central Excise Rules. The duty demand was also sustained in principle, but its enforceability was confined to the five-year period preceding the notice, with the earlier period set aside on limitation grounds. en-us Fri, 17 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 May 2011 16:11:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73254 A show cause notice for differential central excise duty was not vitiated merely because it did not state the exact quantified demand or precise dates where the assessee alone controlled the relevant clearance data and had withheld it despite repeated requisitions. The notice was treated as sufficiently clear because it set out the basis of the demand with adequate particularity under Rule 10 of the Central Excise Rules. The duty demand was also sustained in principle, but its enforceability was confined to the five-year period preceding the notice, with the earlier period set aside on limitation grounds. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73254