<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73252</link>
    <description>A revisionary order cannot be sustained where the statutory notice initiating proceedings is defective and not issued in the manner required by law. The scheme required the Collector to form the requisite opinion and issue notice himself, with the affected person receiving proper notice within the prescribed framework. Here, the proceedings were initiated by a notice from the Assistant Collector, and the later notices also failed to satisfy the statutory requirement. That defect went to the root of jurisdiction, so the Collector&#039;s order was invalid, the order-in-appeal was set aside, and the review notice was discharged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 16:02:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73252</link>
      <description>A revisionary order cannot be sustained where the statutory notice initiating proceedings is defective and not issued in the manner required by law. The scheme required the Collector to form the requisite opinion and issue notice himself, with the affected person receiving proper notice within the prescribed framework. Here, the proceedings were initiated by a notice from the Assistant Collector, and the later notices also failed to satisfy the statutory requirement. That defect went to the root of jurisdiction, so the Collector&#039;s order was invalid, the order-in-appeal was set aside, and the review notice was discharged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>