https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73250 A stay on a refund order was refused because the contested amount was small, the respondent was regularly paying substantial monthly central excise duty, and the Department's affidavit was found insufficiently verified. The Tribunal treated these factors as showing no real prejudice to revenue and no adequate basis for suspending the Collector (Appeals) order directing refund. The balance of convenience therefore favoured the respondent, and the stay application was rejected. en-us Mon, 25 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 May 2011 15:57:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73250 A stay on a refund order was refused because the contested amount was small, the respondent was regularly paying substantial monthly central excise duty, and the Department's affidavit was found insufficiently verified. The Tribunal treated these factors as showing no real prejudice to revenue and no adequate basis for suspending the Collector (Appeals) order directing refund. The balance of convenience therefore favoured the respondent, and the stay application was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73250