https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73249 Mistakes apparent on the face of the record in an earlier CEGAT order were found in the recording of submissions in two paragraphs, and the Tribunal accepted that the inaccurate passages should be corrected by substituting the respondent's actual contention. The rectification application under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was allowed, and the specified corrections were directed to be incorporated into the earlier order. en-us Thu, 14 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 May 2011 15:55:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73249 Mistakes apparent on the face of the record in an earlier CEGAT order were found in the recording of submissions in two paragraphs, and the Tribunal accepted that the inaccurate passages should be corrected by substituting the respondent's actual contention. The rectification application under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was allowed, and the specified corrections were directed to be incorporated into the earlier order. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 14 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73249