<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 310 - ANDHRA PRADESH  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73237</link>
    <description>The article explains that the words &quot;make&quot;, &quot;manufacture&quot;, &quot;prepare&quot; and &quot;process&quot; in section 11 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 carry their ordinary commercial meaning and do not extend to the alleged instantaneous materialisation of gold articles and ornaments from air. It further states that section 16 does not apply where the articles were not acquired for ownership, possession, custody or control in the statutory sense, but were said to be immediately gifted away. The allegations of trust ownership and possession were found unsupported, so no sufficient link was shown to attribute contravention or justify a mandamus for enforcement action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 310 - ANDHRA PRADESH  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73237</link>
      <description>The article explains that the words &quot;make&quot;, &quot;manufacture&quot;, &quot;prepare&quot; and &quot;process&quot; in section 11 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 carry their ordinary commercial meaning and do not extend to the alleged instantaneous materialisation of gold articles and ornaments from air. It further states that section 16 does not apply where the articles were not acquired for ownership, possession, custody or control in the statutory sense, but were said to be immediately gifted away. The allegations of trust ownership and possession were found unsupported, so no sufficient link was shown to attribute contravention or justify a mandamus for enforcement action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>