<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 197 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73223</link>
    <description>Processing of rubber hose into cut, fitted and crimped hose assemblies was treated as manufacture because the finished article had a distinct name, character and use from the bare hose. In the absence of a specific tariff entry for brake hose assemblies, the goods fell under the residuary excise item, and the exemption for piping and tubing of unhardened vulcanized rubber did not apply. A revised classification based only on a change in interpretation, without fresh facts, a tariff amendment, or a later binding ruling, could operate only prospectively from the relevant show cause notices, so earlier duty demands could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 13:52:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 197 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73223</link>
      <description>Processing of rubber hose into cut, fitted and crimped hose assemblies was treated as manufacture because the finished article had a distinct name, character and use from the bare hose. In the absence of a specific tariff entry for brake hose assemblies, the goods fell under the residuary excise item, and the exemption for piping and tubing of unhardened vulcanized rubber did not apply. A revised classification based only on a change in interpretation, without fresh facts, a tariff amendment, or a later binding ruling, could operate only prospectively from the relevant show cause notices, so earlier duty demands could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>