<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 191 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73217</link>
    <description>Cartridge paper of the specified size and grammage was treated as classifiable under Heading 48.01/21(3) as other printing and writing paper, not under the residuary Heading 48.01/21(1). Classification depended on the relative scope of the tariff entries, with the more specific description prevailing over a general or residuary one. The earlier Central Excise decision cited by the Revenue was considered inapposite because it arose under a different tariff structure. Trade understanding and tariff material supported the view that cartridge paper falls within printing and writing paper, and harmonious construction confirmed the specific entry as the proper classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 13:37:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 191 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73217</link>
      <description>Cartridge paper of the specified size and grammage was treated as classifiable under Heading 48.01/21(3) as other printing and writing paper, not under the residuary Heading 48.01/21(1). Classification depended on the relative scope of the tariff entries, with the more specific description prevailing over a general or residuary one. The earlier Central Excise decision cited by the Revenue was considered inapposite because it arose under a different tariff structure. Trade understanding and tariff material supported the view that cartridge paper falls within printing and writing paper, and harmonious construction confirmed the specific entry as the proper classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>