<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 254 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73197</link>
    <description>An importer engaged in setting up manufacture was treated as an actual user where the goods were brought in for use within the production chain, and the absence of completed production at an early stage did not by itself defeat eligibility. The import policy was read to permit materials used for making components of the intended end-products, because inputs in the manufacturing chain were not excluded merely because they were not direct final-goods components. Confiscation, fine and penalty were unsustainable on assumptions of excess quantity or presumed market sale, and customs authorities could not impose restrictions not found in the governing policy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 12:11:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 254 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73197</link>
      <description>An importer engaged in setting up manufacture was treated as an actual user where the goods were brought in for use within the production chain, and the absence of completed production at an early stage did not by itself defeat eligibility. The import policy was read to permit materials used for making components of the intended end-products, because inputs in the manufacturing chain were not excluded merely because they were not direct final-goods components. Confiscation, fine and penalty were unsustainable on assumptions of excess quantity or presumed market sale, and customs authorities could not impose restrictions not found in the governing policy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>