https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73163 The Tribunal rejected the reference application challenging the imposition of a penalty on an individual for clandestine removal of bonded material. The Tribunal found no legal question arising from its order, emphasizing that the decision was based on evidence evaluation and factual circumstances, not warranting a reference. The Tribunal concluded that the evidence supported the respondent's position, dismissing the Department's contentions as lacking merit. The reference application was consequently rejected based on the thorough review of the case materials. en-us Fri, 19 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 May 2011 14:54:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73163 The Tribunal rejected the reference application challenging the imposition of a penalty on an individual for clandestine removal of bonded material. The Tribunal found no legal question arising from its order, emphasizing that the decision was based on evidence evaluation and factual circumstances, not warranting a reference. The Tribunal concluded that the evidence supported the respondent's position, dismissing the Department's contentions as lacking merit. The reference application was consequently rejected based on the thorough review of the case materials. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 19 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73163