<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 193 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73162</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay for a deceased individual&#039;s Reference Customs Application, allowing the legal representatives to proceed. However, the Tribunal held that the Reference Application, filed beyond the condonable period, was not sustainable under the law due to the proviso to Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory limitations and ruled against the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 14:53:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 193 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73162</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay for a deceased individual&#039;s Reference Customs Application, allowing the legal representatives to proceed. However, the Tribunal held that the Reference Application, filed beyond the condonable period, was not sustainable under the law due to the proviso to Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory limitations and ruled against the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>