<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 357 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73148</link>
    <description>An application for reference under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 is not maintainable where the impugned order determines, or necessarily involves, a question relating to the rate of customs duty. Here, the dispute turned on the proper classification of imported goods between competing tariff headings, and the duty consequence depended directly on that classification. The contention that the rate issue was merely incidental was rejected, because the classification question itself affected the applicable duty rate. The request for reference was therefore held to fall within the statutory exclusion and was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 13:34:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 357 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73148</link>
      <description>An application for reference under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 is not maintainable where the impugned order determines, or necessarily involves, a question relating to the rate of customs duty. Here, the dispute turned on the proper classification of imported goods between competing tariff headings, and the duty consequence depended directly on that classification. The contention that the rate issue was merely incidental was rejected, because the classification question itself affected the applicable duty rate. The request for reference was therefore held to fall within the statutory exclusion and was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>