<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 356 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73145</link>
    <description>Ammonium nitrate (melt) produced for captive consumption was not a fertilizer because it was never used or intended to be used as such; it was consumed in manufacture of ammonium nitrate (prilled), and was correctly classified under Item 68. Because the inputs were used to produce a non-fertilizer product, exemption under the relevant notifications for fertilizer manufacture was unavailable. The extended limitation period was justified by failure to maintain proper records and continued reliance on an unsustainable exemption claim after departmental clarification, and the penalty was upheld as commensurate with the evasion and conduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 13:22:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 356 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73145</link>
      <description>Ammonium nitrate (melt) produced for captive consumption was not a fertilizer because it was never used or intended to be used as such; it was consumed in manufacture of ammonium nitrate (prilled), and was correctly classified under Item 68. Because the inputs were used to produce a non-fertilizer product, exemption under the relevant notifications for fertilizer manufacture was unavailable. The extended limitation period was justified by failure to maintain proper records and continued reliance on an unsustainable exemption claim after departmental clarification, and the penalty was upheld as commensurate with the evasion and conduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>