<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 354 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73137</link>
    <description>Penal proceedings under the Gold Control Act require a specific charge in the show cause notice, and a penalty cannot be sustained on a ground not put to notice; where contravention under Section 6(2) or non-accountal as a pawn broker was not alleged, the charge could not be introduced later. The text also states that Section 27(1) applies only where a person actually carries on business as a dealer in gold ornaments, and mere possession of unaccounted ornaments by a pawn broker does not prove such business. Suspicion cannot replace proof in a penal matter, so the confiscation and penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 354 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73137</link>
      <description>Penal proceedings under the Gold Control Act require a specific charge in the show cause notice, and a penalty cannot be sustained on a ground not put to notice; where contravention under Section 6(2) or non-accountal as a pawn broker was not alleged, the charge could not be introduced later. The text also states that Section 27(1) applies only where a person actually carries on business as a dealer in gold ornaments, and mere possession of unaccounted ornaments by a pawn broker does not prove such business. Suspicion cannot replace proof in a penal matter, so the confiscation and penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>