<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (10) TMI 245 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73115</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that duty rates for amended shipping bills should be based on the date of the amendment, not the original bill date. The discretion to permit amendments does not affect the application of Section 16 of the Customs Act. Consequently, the Collector&#039;s order for a refund was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 11:15:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (10) TMI 245 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73115</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that duty rates for amended shipping bills should be based on the date of the amendment, not the original bill date. The discretion to permit amendments does not affect the application of Section 16 of the Customs Act. Consequently, the Collector&#039;s order for a refund was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>