<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 294 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73110</link>
    <description>An assessee&#039;s right to inspect relevant records was recognised, but the Tribunal held that inspection should ordinarily be sought first from the authority in custody of the records, with Tribunal intervention only if access is refused; the lower authorities were directed to permit inspection in accordance with law, subject to confidentiality for privileged documents. The Tribunal also held that procedural paper book requirements could apply retrospectively to transferred proceedings, so the respondents were allowed to file a paper book, but inadmissible material in it could not be treated as part of the record or considered on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 11:01:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 294 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73110</link>
      <description>An assessee&#039;s right to inspect relevant records was recognised, but the Tribunal held that inspection should ordinarily be sought first from the authority in custody of the records, with Tribunal intervention only if access is refused; the lower authorities were directed to permit inspection in accordance with law, subject to confidentiality for privileged documents. The Tribunal also held that procedural paper book requirements could apply retrospectively to transferred proceedings, so the respondents were allowed to file a paper book, but inadmissible material in it could not be treated as part of the record or considered on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>