https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73105 The pre-deposit requirement under Section 35(F) was inapplicable because the impugned order quantified alleged evasion but did not demand duty from the appellant. As the statutory condition applies only where the appealed order relates to duty demanded from the person appealing, no deposit was required or could be dispensed with on that basis. The Tribunal also used incidental powers to protect the subject matter of the appeal by staying recovery of duty until disposal of the appeal. en-us Sun, 24 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 May 2011 10:50:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73105 The pre-deposit requirement under Section 35(F) was inapplicable because the impugned order quantified alleged evasion but did not demand duty from the appellant. As the statutory condition applies only where the appealed order relates to duty demanded from the person appealing, no deposit was required or could be dispensed with on that basis. The Tribunal also used incidental powers to protect the subject matter of the appeal by staying recovery of duty until disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Sun, 24 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73105