https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73099 A 9-day delay in filing an appeal was not condoned because the explanation had to account for the delay day by day and was unsupported by affidavit evidence. The contention that delay had already been effectively condoned through receipt acknowledgment and subsequent stay proceedings was rejected, as a ministerial acknowledgment did not amount to any specific order admitting a time-barred appeal or condoning delay. The appeal was therefore treated as barred by time. en-us Mon, 03 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 May 2011 18:51:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73099 A 9-day delay in filing an appeal was not condoned because the explanation had to account for the delay day by day and was unsupported by affidavit evidence. The contention that delay had already been effectively condoned through receipt acknowledgment and subsequent stay proceedings was rejected, as a ministerial acknowledgment did not amount to any specific order admitting a time-barred appeal or condoning delay. The appeal was therefore treated as barred by time. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73099