<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 162 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73095</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Collector&#039;s order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant due to procedural irregularities and jurisdictional flaws. The appellant successfully argued that the Collector&#039;s review proceedings exceeded the limitation period, rendering the order invalid. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory procedures and limitations in excise classification matters for fairness and legality in administrative decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 18:38:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 162 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73095</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Collector&#039;s order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant due to procedural irregularities and jurisdictional flaws. The appellant successfully argued that the Collector&#039;s review proceedings exceeded the limitation period, rendering the order invalid. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory procedures and limitations in excise classification matters for fairness and legality in administrative decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>