<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 168 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73091</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of feature film reels under Section 113 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the personal penalty of Rs. 25,000 imposed on the appellant for his involvement in the attempted export of the film. Despite arguments regarding evidence evaluation and the application of criminal jurisprudence principles, the Tribunal found no grave error in the Additional Collector&#039;s decision, ultimately rejecting the appeal and affirming the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 18:24:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 168 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73091</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of feature film reels under Section 113 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the personal penalty of Rs. 25,000 imposed on the appellant for his involvement in the attempted export of the film. Despite arguments regarding evidence evaluation and the application of criminal jurisprudence principles, the Tribunal found no grave error in the Additional Collector&#039;s decision, ultimately rejecting the appeal and affirming the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>