<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 192 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73087</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the application for reference to the High Court under Section 130 of the Customs Act was not maintainable as the dispute primarily concerned the rate of duty. Legislative intent directs appeals on rate of duty matters to the Supreme Court for uniformity. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and rejected the application for reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 18:06:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 192 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73087</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the application for reference to the High Court under Section 130 of the Customs Act was not maintainable as the dispute primarily concerned the rate of duty. Legislative intent directs appeals on rate of duty matters to the Supreme Court for uniformity. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and rejected the application for reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>