<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 243 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73063</link>
    <description>An excise demand based solely on classification under Item 47 of the tariff could not stand after the underlying classification order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh classification. The demand had no independent footing once its legal basis disappeared, and the classification question itself was not examined in this appeal. As a result, the demand could not survive in its original form and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 18:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 243 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73063</link>
      <description>An excise demand based solely on classification under Item 47 of the tariff could not stand after the underlying classification order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh classification. The demand had no independent footing once its legal basis disappeared, and the classification question itself was not examined in this appeal. As a result, the demand could not survive in its original form and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>