<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73048</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that Glyoxal 40% qualifies as a &quot;drug intermediate&quot; under Central Excise Notification No. 55/75. Despite challenges to its classification, the Tribunal emphasized the predominant use of Glyoxal 40% in drug manufacturing processes, ultimately granting the appellants the exemption from additional duty of customs. The decision underscored the significance of considering the principal use of the chemical in determining its eligibility for the exemption, providing clarity on the interpretation of the notification and directing customs authorities to implement the ruling promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 172 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73048</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that Glyoxal 40% qualifies as a &quot;drug intermediate&quot; under Central Excise Notification No. 55/75. Despite challenges to its classification, the Tribunal emphasized the predominant use of Glyoxal 40% in drug manufacturing processes, ultimately granting the appellants the exemption from additional duty of customs. The decision underscored the significance of considering the principal use of the chemical in determining its eligibility for the exemption, providing clarity on the interpretation of the notification and directing customs authorities to implement the ruling promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>