https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73044 No referable question of law arose under Section 82B of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 because the only surviving controversy was factual: whether detention had been validly established and whether it was effective. The challenge to the vires and reasonableness of Rule 2(ee) of the Gold Control (Licensing of Dealers) Rules, 1969 was not pressed as a matter for reference. The Tribunal treated its earlier observation as a finding of fact on detention and held that the issue did not raise a legal question fit for reference to the High Court. en-us Wed, 16 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73044 No referable question of law arose under Section 82B of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 because the only surviving controversy was factual: whether detention had been validly established and whether it was effective. The challenge to the vires and reasonableness of Rule 2(ee) of the Gold Control (Licensing of Dealers) Rules, 1969 was not pressed as a matter for reference. The Tribunal treated its earlier observation as a finding of fact on detention and held that the issue did not raise a legal question fit for reference to the High Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73044