<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (7) TMI 175 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73032</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the original assessment classifying the Altitude Test Chamber under Heading 85.59(1) as machines and mechanical appliances, rejecting the appellants&#039; request for reassessment under different headings related to testing equipment. The disagreement between the appellants and the Customs authorities was resolved in favor of the Customs authorities, emphasizing the significance of accurate classification under the Customs Tariff Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (7) TMI 175 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73032</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the original assessment classifying the Altitude Test Chamber under Heading 85.59(1) as machines and mechanical appliances, rejecting the appellants&#039; request for reassessment under different headings related to testing equipment. The disagreement between the appellants and the Customs authorities was resolved in favor of the Customs authorities, emphasizing the significance of accurate classification under the Customs Tariff Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>