<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (7) TMI 173 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73030</link>
    <description>Imported bulk cargo was alleged to have been short-landed, but the record did not satisfactorily establish the shortage because no tally at the time of landing by the Port Trust was available and the draught survey indicated only a slight excess landing. On that material, the allegation of short-landing was not proved. The penalty therefore could not be sustained, and refund of the amount ordered was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 16:42:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (7) TMI 173 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73030</link>
      <description>Imported bulk cargo was alleged to have been short-landed, but the record did not satisfactorily establish the shortage because no tally at the time of landing by the Port Trust was available and the draught survey indicated only a slight excess landing. On that material, the allegation of short-landing was not proved. The penalty therefore could not be sustained, and refund of the amount ordered was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>