<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 169 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73018</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that its appellate powers under section 35C of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 were not confined to granting relief only to the appellant, as they extended to confirming, modifying, annulling or remanding the appealed order. On that basis, a right to withdraw an appeal or petition could not be treated as absolute. The request for withdrawal was nevertheless accepted, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 15:55:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 169 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73018</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that its appellate powers under section 35C of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 were not confined to granting relief only to the appellant, as they extended to confirming, modifying, annulling or remanding the appealed order. On that basis, a right to withdraw an appeal or petition could not be treated as absolute. The request for withdrawal was nevertheless accepted, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=73018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>