<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 156 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72999</link>
    <description>Coercive recovery of customs dues should not be undertaken while stay applications remain pending before the Tribunal, as such action defeats the purpose of stay and amounts to harassment. The order notes that the applicants had already paid the demanded amounts under compulsion, rendering the stay applications infructuous. It also refers to the prevailing convention and departmental instructions against coercive recovery during pendency of stay applications. No substantive adjudication on the merits of the appeals was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 14:38:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 156 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72999</link>
      <description>Coercive recovery of customs dues should not be undertaken while stay applications remain pending before the Tribunal, as such action defeats the purpose of stay and amounts to harassment. The order notes that the applicants had already paid the demanded amounts under compulsion, rendering the stay applications infructuous. It also refers to the prevailing convention and departmental instructions against coercive recovery during pendency of stay applications. No substantive adjudication on the merits of the appeals was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>