<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 153 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72996</link>
    <description>Carbide sludge generated during acetylene gas manufacture was treated as waste or effluent, not excisable goods under Tariff Item 68. The decisive point was marketability: isolated sales and the mere ability to fetch a price did not establish that the residue had the character of goods for central excise purposes. In the absence of credible evidence proving marketability and goods status, the Revenue&#039;s classification claim could not be sustained, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 14:34:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 153 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72996</link>
      <description>Carbide sludge generated during acetylene gas manufacture was treated as waste or effluent, not excisable goods under Tariff Item 68. The decisive point was marketability: isolated sales and the mere ability to fetch a price did not establish that the residue had the character of goods for central excise purposes. In the absence of credible evidence proving marketability and goods status, the Revenue&#039;s classification claim could not be sustained, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>