<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 156 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72990</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 180/61-C.E. applied only when the specified dyes were manufactured from another dye that had retained its duty-paid character. Imported Indigo Pure initially qualified as duty-paid material when countervailing duty was paid, but that character was lost after the assessees took and fully utilised proforma credit under Rule 56-A for other clearances. A later debit entry in the PLA did not revive the original duty-paid status. As the solubilised vats were made from material that no longer satisfied the notification condition, the exemption was unavailable and the demand remained sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 13:42:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=111269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 156 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72990</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 180/61-C.E. applied only when the specified dyes were manufactured from another dye that had retained its duty-paid character. Imported Indigo Pure initially qualified as duty-paid material when countervailing duty was paid, but that character was lost after the assessees took and fully utilised proforma credit under Rule 56-A for other clearances. A later debit entry in the PLA did not revive the original duty-paid status. As the solubilised vats were made from material that no longer satisfied the notification condition, the exemption was unavailable and the demand remained sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>